ABSTRACT
Throughout history, the human population has experienced major outbreaks of infectious diseases. In December 2019 the previously unknown SARS-CoV-2 virus emerged, which had a huge impact globally. Residents of long- term care facilities (LTCFs) showed to be highly susceptible to infection due to their frailty. Respiratory infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, can spread among others via the airborne transmission route. This is caused by sharing the same indoor environment. To reduce the risk of infection via the airborne route, it is important to consider ventilation and other building services system measures, including personalized ventilation (PV). PV has the potential of being a suitable solution for LTCFs, as it could still allow interaction between residents and visitors in the common rooms, which is regarded very important from a mental health perspective. To identify the potential of PV in the context of infection risk, a laboratory experiment was conducted to investigate its effectiveness on the infection risk reduction. The research was performed in a controlled climate chamber. In the experiment a person was mimicked and positioned close to a PV system that provided filtered recirculated air. A particle source maintained a constant particle concentration in the room. The performance of the PV system was measured through the particle concentration near the breathing zone as compared to the room concentration. Several design parameters were investigated. Translating the outcomes to a fictive (equivalent) ventilation rate, the Wells-Riley equation was applied to determine the infection risk. The outcomes indicated that, in this laboratory setting, the PV system can reduce the risk of an infection up to 50%. The performance is affected by the distance of the supply head to the breathing zone, the angle of the supply head, airflows in the room and the location of the particle source. To further optimize the system and allow its application in LTCFs, several aspects still need further attention, such as mobility/placing the person, the breathing pattern of the user and factors influencing the comfort and use. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ABSTRACT
PurposeThis paper aims to study employee mental health in relation to workplace design and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) when working from home, which has received little attention. The trend toward hybrid working urges for more knowledge. Design/methodology/approachThrough a mixed data collection method, this study analyzed potential relationships (between mental health, workplace design and IEQ) from information obtained through a cross-sectional survey, repeated point-in-time surveys and desk-based IEQ sensors at home. Data were collected in April 2020 during a national COVID-19 lockdown in The Netherlands amongst 36 subjects. They all worked full time from home in this period and together completed 321 point-in-time surveys. The three data sets were combined and analyzed using bivariate and path analysis. FindingsOutcomes indicate that subjective and objective IEQ conditions, workplace suitability and distraction affect employee mental health in the home workplace in a similar way as in the office. Being satisfied with the noise level increases concentration, self-reported well-being and engagement. High sound pressure levels (>58 dB) increased tension or nervous feelings. Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is one of the first to explore employee mental health in relation to simultaneously assessed (perceived and measured) multiple IEQ parameters in the home workplace.
ABSTRACT
Some infectious diseases, including COVID-19, can undergo airborne transmission. This may happen at close proximity, but as time indoors increases, infections can occur in shared room air despite distancing. We propose two indicators of infection risk for this situation, that is, relative risk parameter (Hr) and risk parameter (H). They combine the key factors that control airborne disease transmission indoors: virus-containing aerosol generation rate, breathing flow rate, masking and its quality, ventilation and aerosol-removal rates, number of occupants, and duration of exposure. COVID-19 outbreaks show a clear trend that is consistent with airborne infection and enable recommendations to minimize transmission risk. Transmission in typical prepandemic indoor spaces is highly sensitive to mitigation efforts. Previous outbreaks of measles, influenza, and tuberculosis were also assessed. Measles outbreaks occur at much lower risk parameter values than COVID-19, while tuberculosis outbreaks are observed at higher risk parameter values. Because both diseases are accepted as airborne, the fact that COVID-19 is less contagious than measles does not rule out airborne transmission. It is important that future outbreak reports include information on masking, ventilation and aerosol-removal rates, number of occupants, and duration of exposure, to investigate airborne transmission.